[KB] Complexity vs. Power

Fri Jun 4 13:36:35 EDT 2021

Power:  ATH front matter,5, 22, 23, 24, 35, 38, 42, 46, 60, 68, 91, 95, 97, 101, 103, 112, 117, 122,130, 131, 132, 137, 152, 156, 170, 195, 197, 219, 235, 277, 316, 332, 333, 336,back matter; CG 4, 13; CS 12, 51, 58, 76, 91, 103, 111, 115, 117, 119, 135, 155,159, 160-162 

POWER                                                            322                                                            PRAISE

(and complexity)*,167, 181*; CWO 303; D 342; DD 28; F&A 367; GM 11, 13,16, 24, 47, 56, 70, 87-89, 100, 102, 105, 108, 111, 113-114, 116-124, 142,146-149, 155, 160, 167-169, 171, 174, 176, 181-187, 199, 205, 207-209, 212,215, 217, 223, 230, 233-244, 251-252, 254, 264-267, 270, 272, 275, 286, 288,290, 304-305, 307, 318, 335, 341, 363, 367, 375, 378, 381-382, 385-387, 390,393-394, 398, 407-408, 413, 420, 435-436; H&E226; HP front matter, 10, 41, 51, 53, 70,81, 135, 232; LSA 318; MT 50-51; OC 338, 343, 345, 346, 350, 353, 356, 357, 369, 373, 374; OHN throughout; OSS 4, 46, 63, 66, 68-70,78, 81, 85, 95-96, 98, 111, 114, 153, 171, 173-175, 185-186, 194, 208, 224-226,228-229, 238, 248, 264, 281, 284, 292-293, 303, 310-311, 314, back matter; P&C 413; PC 5-6, 59-61, 88, 110,128, 160, 177, 182, 207-209, 217, 225, 252, 262, 268, 272, and throughout; PLF xxi, 55 (ambivalence of), 59-60 (ambivalenceof), 102-103; RM 5, 30; RPL 32, 33; RR 17, 29,37, 49, 54-55, 84, 86-88, 98, 103, 110, 117, 119, 125-127, 137, 141, 155, 165,170, 174, 181, 185, 194-199, 216, 224, 241, 259-260, 271, back matter; RS 267, 269-271; 273-274; T&L 152-155, 166,169, 171-174, 179; TBL 14, 75, 83, 150, 201,209; TM 26, 40, 50;   

Dr. Stan A. Lindsay, Ph.D. Professional Communication  College of Applied Studies  Florida State University (850) 319-0713slindsay at pc.fsu.eduhttp://www.stanlindsay.com  (Personal Blog)http://fsuprofessional.wix.com/mysite (Undergrad/Online Courses)

    On Friday, June 4, 2021, 12:41:43 PM EDT, M. Karen Walker <m.karen.walker.phd at gmail.com> wrote:  

 Perhaps you're thinking of an essay by George Cheney, Kathy Garvin-Doxas and Kathleen Torrens, titled Kenneth Burke's Implicit Theory of Power. I came across it in Brock's edited volume, Kenneth Burke and the 21st Century. Their essay is on pages 133-150. 
Here is the concluding para of their essay (p. 148):
Burke's implicit theory of power allows for the complexities that a good theory of power must have. As Stewart Clegg explains, there has been a tension, historically, between sovereign-centered theories of power that invest power in persons or groups (a view he traces back to Hobbes) and perspectives on power as a pervasive and often consciously strategic aspect of human relations (a view that for Clegg originates with Machievelli). Burke's implicit theory of power includes both "sides" because it is at once social and individual, with language as the creative resource for formulating those two levels and their interrelationships_______________________________________________
KB mailing list
KB at kbjournal.org
http://kbjournal.org/mailman/listinfo/kb_kbjournal.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kbjournal.org/pipermail/kb_kbjournal.org/attachments/20210604/1a360e62/attachment.htm>