[KB] (no subject)
wblakesx at yahoo.com
Fri Aug 8 23:06:01 EDT 2014
Ah, thanks so much Carol, for the direction and discussion.
Perhaps it would be best if I could review the posts on the other list... I am widely read and in certain subjects rather ddeply but I am not an academic... and I still type with a little distracting difficulty which will affect my style. Thus, your terms: empirical
generalization and theoretical EXPLANATION; may meanings as 'terms of art' referencing a speciality while I may normally to use them from a broader or more idiosyncratic frame... or Burkean 'ground'.
I'll be up for awhile longer if you'd an to et into it.
-David aka wblake' as in 'everything would appear as it is, infinite', lately reading Cassirer on Nicholus of Cusa
On Fri, 8/8/14, Carrol Cox <cbcox at ilstu.edu> wrote:
Subject: RE: [KB] (no subject)
To: "'de gava'" <wblakesx at yahoo.com>, kb at kbjournal.org
Date: Friday, August 8, 2014, 10:46 PM
(You need to click
"Reply All"; otherwise it goes to the post's
rather than to kb.)
I'm interested in your
somewhat cryptic message because on another list I am
writing on the difference between theory on the
one hand and "what needs to
explained" on the other. And involved in that is a
generalization and theoretical EXPLANATION.
From: kb-bounces at kbjournal.org
[mailto:kb-bounces at kbjournal.org]
Of de gava
Friday, August 08, 2014 9:34 PM
To: kb at kbjournal.org
Subject: [KB] (no subject)
I think I can add to this discussion. In
earlier days I replied to the
received but they went to Ed so to kick off I'd like to
kb at kbjournal.org as
an address to the e-list and ask if anyone has looked
closely into the nature of
'explanations'. More to follow perhaps.
KB mailing list
KB at kbjournal.org
More information about the KB